Book Review :: Cowboys Full

cowboysfullSuper System, Harrington on Hold’em and Poker for Dummies are all text books that would be required reading if your local college offered poker as a subject. (In the case of Poker for Dummies, think community college.) Cowboys Full, on the other hand, is the book you would give a high school grad you are pushing toward said class. I just finished reading Cowboys Full and didn’t learn so much as a good opening hand. If there was a lesson in the book at all, it was a history lesson.

James McManus first wrote of the poker world in his book Positively Fifth Street, an exploration of the Ted Binion murder. It was a book that appealed to both fans of the game and fans of murder mysteries. In contrast, Cowboys Full appeals to a narrower audience and covers a wider subject matter. To like Cowboys Full you have to really like poker. Much of the book reads as a celebration of poker. It covers the European roots of the game and follows it’s evolution through the US revolution, into the wild west with Bill Hiccock, hitches a ride on Mark Twain’s steam boats, and ends with the creation and popularization of the WSOP. If you have been playing as long as I have, I’m sure you’ve picked up some of the game’s history; I’m also sure there is more to learn within.

Overall, I enjoyed the history lesson.

The later third of Cowboys Full is a play by play account of the most high-stakes games in recent history. If you liked The Professor, the Banker, and the Suicide King you’ll like this part, but if you read The Professor, the Banker, and the Suicide King you can probably skip much of this part. There are some interesting bits about Asian culture and why the Vietnamese are ideal poker players, but not enough. When it comes to learning about WSOP final tables, television is my preferred medium. Call me when McManus makes Cowboys Full the documentary.

I like both books about poker and studies of poker. Cowboys Full just isn’t my favorite, Ace on the River is. For me, Cowboys Full was just too much poker on parade and would have benefited in editing out a few (dozen) pages.

Have you read the book? Am I wrong? Please let me know your favorite poker in print, I always have room on my shelf.

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 12th, 2009 at 1:17 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

View Comments to “Book Review :: Cowboys Full”

Trevor Holewinski December 14th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

Kinda shocked this website is still going…

You “playing” poker again?

Grundy December 15th, 2009 at 5:28 am

I never stopped. Well, I stopped online for a bit, but I'm back now.

Still going strong! I don't need a fresh coat of paint to stay fresh, unlike your puny site.

Lea December 17th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

My friend from college is so hooked-up with playing poker, I might give him this kind of book.

Lea December 17th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

My friend from college is so hooked-up with playing poker, I might give him this kind of book.

jim_mcmanus December 30th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

A New York Times Book Review Editors’ Choice
A Chicago Tribune Favorite Book of 2009
One of the Best Books of the Year. Amazon.com
One of the Best Books of 2009. San Francisco Chronicle

“Poker now has what must surely be its definitive history in this excellent, comprehensive account of the game.” Publishers Weekly (starred review)
“Entertaining, informative and genial. . . . McManus writes with verve [and] authority. [A] copious, lively account of poker’s past and present.” Robert Pinsky, New York Times Book Review
“If there were a World Series of Poker Writing, then James McManus just won the main event. It’s not only that McManus delivers the definitive history of the game with Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker, it’s that he’s so entertaining doing it that even non-pokeristas will get swept along for the ride. [He] manages to transform poker into a character in a historical novel—a character we follow from its ancestry in Asia, Europe and the Middle East to New Orleans in the early 1800s, then up the Mississippi on riverboats to every corner of the inchoate country. . . . Just as Doyle Brunson’s Super System and Dan Harrington’s Harrington on Hold’em are the books on playing poker, Cowboys Full is now the book about the game.” Rathe Miller, Philadelphia Inquirer
“Mr. McManus writes about our American love of poker like James A. Michener describing the Plains Indians’ discovery of the buffalo: ‘Wait a second . . . I can eat it, wear it, make it into a drum . . . there’s nothing I can’t do with this sonofabitch.’ I would throw in ‘A joy for poker players and non-players alike,’ but, of the second group, who cares what they read—and I don’t think there are enough of them to affect Mr. McManus’s royalties.” David Mamet
“A history of the game with all its unsavory and distinguished practitioners. [It] explains a lot about who we are as a culture. America is where the game was popularized, and in his new book McManus lists dozens of powerful Americans who have spent long nights hunched over a card table betting — and bluffing — their way to riches or ruin. [He] reads the game’s lessons as a necessary ingredient in the development of the American ideology.” Guy Raz, All Things Considered
“The book is sensational. McManus is a writer of immense talent, deft with language and with an ear that seems to catch all the right conversations. And he has a cast of characters that would be the envy of the most imaginative novelist.” Rick Kogan, Chicago Tribune
“Cowboys Full is a deal-me-in delight. Starting with a sweeping survey of the history of the game and its role in American culture, McManus ends with a smart, insiders’ analysis of how poker has been—and should be—played. . . . Stuffed with anecdotes. . . . Beyond its importance as a model and metaphor for American culture, society, and politics, Cowboys Full demonstrates, poker is fascinating in its own right.” Glenn C. Altschuler, Boston Globe
“Passion is enlivening, and authors who have it draw us in. We want it because without it we would be angels, and no one, really, wants that. James McManus is passionate about poker, not a game for angels but one once associated with sin and played in murky rooms by rough men. [His] Cowboys Full is 516 pages of all things poker: history, trivia, strategy, analysis. It’s a compendium, an omnium-gatherum, an anecdotal encyclopedia of poker. [He] shows its influence on every American war, the building of the great cities, the settlement of the West, politics and [how it] teaches us like no other game can how to survive in life, maybe even win more than we lose.” Tom Dodge, Dallas Morning News
“A poet and novelist, McManus revels in the language of the game . . . whose long, colorful history in the U.S. comes to life through [his] research and narrative wit. McManus knows the green-felt world, having entered the World Series of Poker in 2000 while researching a magazine article. He finished fifth and produced a classic book in Positively Fifth Street. . . . With its detailed history and 87 pages of notes, glossary and index, Cowboys Full manages to be authoritative and entertaining. The book closes with a look at the global explosion of Internet poker, the electronic fraud that quickly emerged with it and the U.S. legislative efforts to ban or rein in Web gambling—efforts that McManus convincingly portrays as uncommonly wrongheaded even by Washington standards.” Jeffrey Burke, Bloomberg News

jim_mcmanus December 30th, 2009 at 8:04 pm

Grundy: you write, “I just finished reading Cowboys Full and didn’t learn so much as a good opening hand. If there was a lesson in the book at all, it was a history lesson.” Since the title and dust-jacket information makes it 100 percent clear that the book is a history, and nowhere suggests it will offer strategy lessons, then why do you sound surprised and disappointed that you learned nothing about starting-hand selection?

Grundy December 31st, 2009 at 5:58 pm

It's a good book if he talks about poker as much as he plays it.

Grundy December 31st, 2009 at 6:08 pm

Hi, Jim, any relation to the author?

You can't really call me out for stating something that is true. I'm assuming my readers don't have the dust cover handy. I'm just making it a 100% clear to people who haven't yet looked at the book that it is, in fact, strategy-free. I wasn't disappointed, I'm just getting it out there.

I think I made it clear that I liked parts of the book, but most of what I liked can be summed up in McManus' article here: http://chronicle.com/article/What-Poker-Can-Tea...

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus